<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Surety Bond Blog &#187; workers comp</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jwsuretybonds.com/blog/tag/workers-comp/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jwsuretybonds.com/blog</link>
	<description>General to specific surety bond information, as well as current events within the industry.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 13:32:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>States Re-examine Workers Compensation Self-Insurance Bonds</title>
		<link>http://www.jwsuretybonds.com/blog/states-re-examine-workers-compensation-self-insurance-bonds</link>
		<comments>http://www.jwsuretybonds.com/blog/states-re-examine-workers-compensation-self-insurance-bonds#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 15:13:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Heidi Wolf</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surety News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[self insurance bond]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workers comp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workers compensation bond]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jwsuretybonds.com/blog/?p=418</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In states that allow employers to self-insure their workersâ€™ compensation liability, a security requirement is set for the applicant at the same time the state agency gives its absolute approval. Most times, the employer chooses to satisfy this requirement by purchasing a Self-Insurance Bond. Itâ€™s the quickest, most cost-effective way to provide the state with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In states that allow employers to self-insure their workersâ€™ compensation liability, a security requirement is set for the applicant at the same time the state agency gives its absolute approval. Most times, the employer chooses to satisfy this requirement by purchasing a Self-Insurance Bond. Itâ€™s the quickest, most cost-effective way to provide the state with what it requires, when needed, without tying up capital.</p>
<p>Just recently, the Workers Compensation Board (WCB) in the state of New York released a report this year on other funding models for workers compensation self-insurance based on an instruction from a 2007 law. At the present time, New York requires approved self-insurers to put forward security for their liabilities, which can be met with a surety bond.  The report proposes moving from personal security deposits to a guarantee fund, eliminating the need for bonding. SFAA believed that this was a constructive progression based on the fact that it was restricted and preserved the opportunity of self-insuring individually. The AIA local counsel has informed SFAA that the reportâ€™s proposition for self-insurance plans may be handled in 2009.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jwsuretybonds.com/blog/states-re-examine-workers-compensation-self-insurance-bonds/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

