<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Surety Bond Blog &#187; public official bond</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jwsuretybonds.com/blog/tag/public-official-bond/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jwsuretybonds.com/blog</link>
	<description>General to specific surety bond information, as well as current events within the industry.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 13:46:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Utah Public Official Bond Update</title>
		<link>http://www.jwsuretybonds.com/blog/utah-public-official-bond-update</link>
		<comments>http://www.jwsuretybonds.com/blog/utah-public-official-bond-update#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 12:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Weisbrot</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commercial Bonds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misc. Commerical Bonds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surety News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bond requirements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commercial bonds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public official bond]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surety bond]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[utah]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jwsuretybonds.com/blog/?p=3620</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Several public officials in the state of Utah no longer need to worry about surety bonds. The new bill, labeled HB 40, terminates multiple public official bond requirements and allows certain officials to be covered under the State’s Risk Management Fund. Make sure to check with the state to find out which public officials are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style="float: right; margin-left: 10px; margin-top: 10px; margin-bottom: 10px;" src="http://www.jwsuretybonds.com/images/bond-utah.jpg" alt="" /><br />
Several public officials in the state of Utah no longer need to worry about surety bonds. The new bill, labeled HB 40, terminates multiple public official bond requirements and allows certain officials to be covered under the State’s Risk Management Fund.  Make sure to check with the state to find out which public officials are included in this bill. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jwsuretybonds.com/blog/utah-public-official-bond-update/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Surety Bond Protects County From Losing Thousands</title>
		<link>http://www.jwsuretybonds.com/blog/surety-bond-protects-against-untrustworthy-public-official</link>
		<comments>http://www.jwsuretybonds.com/blog/surety-bond-protects-against-untrustworthy-public-official#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 12:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Weisbrot</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commercial Bonds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misc. Commerical Bonds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surety News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bond requirements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commercial bonds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public official bond]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surety bond]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jwsuretybonds.com/blog/?p=3553</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not many people know what a public official bond is. Public official bonds ensure that individuals serving the public such as tax collectors or judges follow the rules of their county/state. The people of New Albany, IN may soon become fans of public official bonds pending a ruling on a recent case where a public [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not many people know what a <a href="http://www.jwsuretybonds.com/surety-bonds/commercial-bonds/public_official_bond.htm"> public official bond</a> is. Public official bonds ensure that individuals serving the public such as tax collectors or judges follow the rules of their county/state. The people of New Albany, IN may soon become fans of public official bonds pending a ruling on a recent case where a public official allegedly mishandled thousands of dollars. <span id="more-3553"></span></p>
<p>Ronald Quakenbush, a former Floyd County Highway Department superintendent allegedly mismanaged thousands of public funds. Quakenbush supervised the county highway department and its disposal of guard rails, old culverts and other salvageable pieces. The highway department transported metal to various recycling companies that paid for the scrap; the cash and receipts were to be given to Quakenbush to be forwarded to the county auditor. According to the State Board of Accounts (SBoA) audit, Quakenbush never sent $12,526.67 in cash payments from the recyclers. Also, the audit states that some funds received from recyclers were deposited into a bank account that Quakenbush opened up in 2006. Western Surety Company was the surety company who wrote the $15,000 <a href="http://www.jwsuretybonds.com/"> surety bond</a> which was in place for a situation just like this. </p>
<p>&#8220;The State Board of Accounts examiners determined that this was not merely a case of bad bookkeeping,&#8221; Attorney General Greg Zoeller  said. &#8220;It is my responsibility to the public to recover these public funds. When those entrusted with responsibility over taxpayers&#8217; money violate that trust, then the attorney general&#8217;s office is authorized to take legal action to reimburse the public treasury.&#8221;</p>
<p>Since the bond was in place, the county can recover up to $15,000 and possibly more from the surety company depending on the language in the bond and the legitimacy of the accusations. Should the county get reimbursed by Western Surety, they will go to whoever caused the problem in the first place to get paid back. Zoeller is looking to recover $17,745.34 for the county which includes audit and attorney fees.</p>
<p>With the protection of the public official bond in place, Floyd County has the chance to get back their money which otherwise may have been lost forever. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jwsuretybonds.com/blog/surety-bond-protects-against-untrustworthy-public-official/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Indiana Public Official Bond Update</title>
		<link>http://www.jwsuretybonds.com/blog/indiana-public-official-bond-update-2</link>
		<comments>http://www.jwsuretybonds.com/blog/indiana-public-official-bond-update-2#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 14:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Weisbrot</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commercial Bonds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misc. Commerical Bonds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surety News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bond requirements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commercial bonds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public official bond]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surety bond]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jwsuretybonds.com/blog/?p=3487</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Various public officials in Indiana are affected by new surety legislation recently put in place. The new law is named HB 1025 and revokes the requirement that makes various public officials’ bonds annual. HB 1025 modifies an existing requirement for a bond with annual coverage in the amount of $30,000 for each $1 million of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style="float: right; margin-left: 10px; margin-top: 10px; margin-bottom: 10px;" src="http://www.jwsuretybonds.com/images/bond-indiana.jpg" alt="" /><br />
Various public officials in Indiana are affected by new surety legislation recently put in place. The new law is named HB 1025 and revokes the requirement that makes various public officials’ bonds annual. HB 1025 modifies an existing requirement for a bond with annual coverage in the amount of $30,000 for each $1 million of receipts of the officer&#8217;s office during the previous fiscal year before the acquisition of the bond; this new law affects city controllers, city clerk treasurers, town clerk treasurers, Barrett Law fund custodians, county treasurers, county sheriffs, circuit court clerks, township trustees, and conservancy district financial clerks.  HB 1025  caps the bond at $300,000 for the officials listed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jwsuretybonds.com/blog/indiana-public-official-bond-update-2/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

