<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Surety Bond Blog &#187; performance bond</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jwsuretybonds.com/blog/tag/performance-bond/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jwsuretybonds.com/blog</link>
	<description>General to specific surety bond information, as well as current events within the industry.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 18:39:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>North Carolina Medicaid Supplier Performance Bond</title>
		<link>http://www.jwsuretybonds.com/blog/north-carolina-medicaid-supplier-performance-bond</link>
		<comments>http://www.jwsuretybonds.com/blog/north-carolina-medicaid-supplier-performance-bond#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 17:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Weisbrot</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commercial Bonds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance Bonds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surety News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicaid Supplier Bond]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance bond]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jwsuretybonds.com/blog/?p=957</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 05/26/2008, a new law was introduced referred to as HB 2436. The new North Carolina law permits the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services to have discretion when requiring Medicaid-enrolled suppliers to provide a performance bond, letter of credit, or an alternative financial instrument in an amount no more than $100,000. Previous [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jwsuretybonds.com%2Fblog%2Fnorth-carolina-medicaid-supplier-performance-bond"><img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jwsuretybonds.com%2Fblog%2Fnorth-carolina-medicaid-supplier-performance-bond" height="61" width="51" /></a></div><p><img style="float: right" src="http://www.jwsuretybonds.com/images/bond-north-carolina.jpg" alt="North Carolina"/>On 05/26/2008, a new law was introduced referred to as HB 2436. The new North Carolina law permits the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services to have discretion when requiring Medicaid-enrolled suppliers to provide a performance bond, letter of credit, or an alternative financial instrument in an amount no more than $100,000. Previous law required the bond as a stipulation of receiving Medicaid payments. HB 2436 states that the health department may require a surety bond when the provider has failed to display financial viability, if it is concluded that “significant potential” for deception and fraud existed, or if the department determines that it is best for the Medicaid program. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jwsuretybonds.com/blog/north-carolina-medicaid-supplier-performance-bond/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Arizona Flood Protection Facility Performance Bond</title>
		<link>http://www.jwsuretybonds.com/blog/arizona-flood-protection-facility-performance-bond</link>
		<comments>http://www.jwsuretybonds.com/blog/arizona-flood-protection-facility-performance-bond#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 14:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tracy Konopka</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Contract Bonds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance Bonds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surety News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[az]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bond requirements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flood protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance bond]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surety bond]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jwsuretybonds.com/blog/?p=738</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SB1289, enacted on April 28, 2008 and made effective October 10, 2008, created flood protection districts and a Board of Directors for each district to construct flood protection facilities.  The new law states that performance and payment bonds are required for any construction, and clarifies the process for claims against the performance and payment [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jwsuretybonds.com%2Fblog%2Farizona-flood-protection-facility-performance-bond"><img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jwsuretybonds.com%2Fblog%2Farizona-flood-protection-facility-performance-bond" height="61" width="51" /></a></div><p><img style="float: right" src="http://www.jwsuretybonds.com/images/bond-arizona.jpg" alt="Arizona"/>SB1289, enacted on April 28, 2008 and made effective October 10, 2008, created flood protection districts and a Board of Directors for each district to construct flood protection facilities.  The new law states that performance and payment bonds are required for any construction, and clarifies the process for claims against the performance and payment bonds.  The surety has 60 days to act upon a contractor found to be in default by the board or the board may re-let the contract.  If the costs to complete the project surpass the finances available for payment, the defaulting contractorâ€™s surety has 20 days after mailing of the notice to satisfy the boardâ€™s demand for payment of the difference.  This demand cannot be more then the penal sum of the bond, and monies must be used to pay for the costs of completing the work.  Delivery of writ may be served on the Suretyâ€™s principal office or itâ€™s Attorney-In-Fact.  If there is no office or Attorney-In-Fact, it may be service on the insurance commissioner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jwsuretybonds.com/blog/arizona-flood-protection-facility-performance-bond/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>California Telecommunications Public Utility Bond</title>
		<link>http://www.jwsuretybonds.com/blog/telecommunication-public-utility-performance-bond</link>
		<comments>http://www.jwsuretybonds.com/blog/telecommunication-public-utility-performance-bond#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 20:40:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lisa Grimsley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Performance Bonds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surety News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bond requirements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance bond]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surety bond]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jwsuretybonds.com/blog/?p=671</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As of January 1, 2009, the Public Utilities Commission of California may require a performance bond as a precondition of getting certain certificates and permits for telecommunications companies. AB 2578 allows this, also stating that the bond has to be sufficient to allow the collection of restitution, penalties, and fines for enforcement actions taken against [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jwsuretybonds.com%2Fblog%2Ftelecommunication-public-utility-performance-bond"><img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jwsuretybonds.com%2Fblog%2Ftelecommunication-public-utility-performance-bond" height="61" width="51" /></a></div><p><img style="float: right" src="http://www.jwsuretybonds.com/images/bond-california.jpg" alt="California" />As of January 1, 2009, the Public Utilities Commission of California may require a performance bond as a precondition of getting certain certificates and permits for telecommunications companies. AB 2578 allows this, also stating that the bond has to be sufficient to allow the collection of restitution, penalties, and fines for enforcement actions taken against the company. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jwsuretybonds.com/blog/telecommunication-public-utility-performance-bond/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
