<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Surety Bond Blog &#187; maryland</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jwsuretybonds.com/blog/tag/maryland/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jwsuretybonds.com/blog</link>
	<description>General to specific surety bond information, as well as current events within the industry.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 15:05:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Maryland Utility Installation Bond</title>
		<link>http://www.jwsuretybonds.com/blog/maryland-utility-installation-bond</link>
		<comments>http://www.jwsuretybonds.com/blog/maryland-utility-installation-bond#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 13:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Weisbrot</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bond requirements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maryland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surety bond]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utility Installation Bond]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jwsuretybonds.com/blog/?p=1605</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
			
				
			
		
Introduced on February 13th, 2009 was a new law concerning utility installers within Maryland. HB 1221 is the title of the new law and requires a surety bond or other security in association with a right-of-way permit for the installation and implementation of utilities in Washington County. The surety bond guarantees the refurbishment of county [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jwsuretybonds.com%2Fblog%2Fmaryland-utility-installation-bond"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jwsuretybonds.com%2Fblog%2Fmaryland-utility-installation-bond&amp;style=normal" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p><img style="float: right" src="http://www.jwsuretybonds.com/images/bond-maryland.jpg" alt="Maryland" />Introduced on February 13th, 2009 was a new law concerning utility installers within Maryland. HB 1221 is the title of the new law and requires a surety bond or other security in association with a right-of-way permit for the installation and implementation of utilities in Washington County. The surety bond guarantees the refurbishment of county property at the location on which the work was executed. HB 1221 was enacted on 05/07/2009. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jwsuretybonds.com/blog/maryland-utility-installation-bond/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kentucky Law Enforcement Bond</title>
		<link>http://www.jwsuretybonds.com/blog/maryland-law-enforcement-bond</link>
		<comments>http://www.jwsuretybonds.com/blog/maryland-law-enforcement-bond#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:09:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Weisbrot</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commercial Bonds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misc. Commerical Bonds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surety News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bond requirements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Enforcement Bond]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maryland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surety bond]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jwsuretybonds.com/blog/?p=1600</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
			
				
			
		
Police officers within the state of Kentucky must abide by a new bill that was presented on February 11th, 2009. The new bill is named HB 411 and requires police officers to acquire a surety bond to secure the expenses of a court appeal from a conviction in the Kentucky State Police Department’s trial board [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jwsuretybonds.com%2Fblog%2Fmaryland-law-enforcement-bond"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jwsuretybonds.com%2Fblog%2Fmaryland-law-enforcement-bond&amp;style=normal" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p><img style="float: right" src="http://www.jwsuretybonds.com/images/bond-kentucky.jpg" alt="Kentucky" />Police officers within the state of Kentucky must abide by a new bill that was presented on February 11th, 2009. The new bill is named HB 411 and requires police officers to acquire a surety bond to secure the expenses of a court appeal from a conviction in the Kentucky State Police Department’s trial board for a breach of the law with reference to police officer conduct. HB 411 was enacted on March 24th, 2009. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jwsuretybonds.com/blog/maryland-law-enforcement-bond/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Maryland Drug Distributor Bond</title>
		<link>http://www.jwsuretybonds.com/blog/maryland-drug-distributor-bond</link>
		<comments>http://www.jwsuretybonds.com/blog/maryland-drug-distributor-bond#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 13:32:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Weisbrot</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commercial Bonds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misc. Commerical Bonds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surety News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bond requirements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drug Distributor Bond]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maryland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surety bond]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jwsuretybonds.com/blog/?p=1594</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
			
				
			
		
A new bill was introduced relating to wholesale drug distributors within the state of Maryland. The new bill was named HB 1195 and modifies the surety bond requirement for wholesale drug distributors, which under present law must acquire a surety bond or alternative equal security. The previous law required a surety bond in the quantity [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jwsuretybonds.com%2Fblog%2Fmaryland-drug-distributor-bond"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jwsuretybonds.com%2Fblog%2Fmaryland-drug-distributor-bond&amp;style=normal" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p><img style="float: right" src="http://www.jwsuretybonds.com/images/bond-maryland.jpg" alt="Maryland" />A new bill was introduced relating to wholesale drug distributors within the state of Maryland. The new bill was named HB 1195 and modifies the surety bond requirement for wholesale drug distributors, which under present law must acquire a surety bond or alternative equal security. The previous law required a surety bond in the quantity of at least $100,000 in association with attaining a permit. HB 1195 calculates the amount required by the distributor’s yearly gross receipts instead, so that if such receipts in the prior tax year were $10 million or greater, a $100,000 surety bond is required. A $50,000 surety bond is demanded if receipts are no more than $10 million. </p>
<p>The SFAA cooperated on this bill with the AIA to resist the Maryland Insurance Administration’s preliminary suggestion, which would have revoked the surety bond requirement. The compromise was reached, which will boost the availability of the surety bond for smaller distributors and any distributors subject to bonding requirements in numerous states that is reaching their bonding capacity. HB 1195 became active upon enactment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jwsuretybonds.com/blog/maryland-drug-distributor-bond/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
