<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Surety Bond Blog &#187; license bond</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jwsuretybonds.com/blog/tag/license-bond/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jwsuretybonds.com/blog</link>
	<description>General to specific surety bond information, as well as current events within the industry.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 15:05:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Alabama Boxing Promoters License Bond</title>
		<link>http://www.jwsuretybonds.com/blog/alabama-boxing-promoters-license-bond</link>
		<comments>http://www.jwsuretybonds.com/blog/alabama-boxing-promoters-license-bond#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 15:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Weisbrot</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commercial Bonds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance Bonds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surety News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alabama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bond requirements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boxing Promoters Bond]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iowa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[license bond]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surety bond]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jwsuretybonds.com/blog/?p=1247</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
			
				
			
		
The state of Alabama enacted a new law on 05/21/2009 concerning the Boxing Commission. The new law, which is labeled SB 98, produces the Alabama Boxing Commission.  SB 98 now requires promoters to be licensed and must acquire a performance bond in an amount and under the conditions that the commission will establish. Also, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jwsuretybonds.com%2Fblog%2Falabama-boxing-promoters-license-bond"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jwsuretybonds.com%2Fblog%2Falabama-boxing-promoters-license-bond&amp;style=normal" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p><img style="float: right" src="http://www.jwsuretybonds.com/images/bond-alabama.jpg" alt="Alabama"/>The state of Alabama enacted a new law on 05/21/2009 concerning the Boxing Commission. The new law, which is labeled SB 98, produces the Alabama Boxing Commission.  SB 98 now requires promoters to be licensed and must acquire a performance bond in an amount and under the conditions that the commission will establish. Also, any individual boxing promoter is required to post a permit for every match and the Boxing Commission can ask for a performance bond with any permit as well as the license bond.   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jwsuretybonds.com/blog/alabama-boxing-promoters-license-bond/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>California Exchange Facilitators Bond</title>
		<link>http://www.jwsuretybonds.com/blog/california-exchange-facilitators-bond</link>
		<comments>http://www.jwsuretybonds.com/blog/california-exchange-facilitators-bond#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 15:47:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lisa Grimsley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commercial Bonds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surety News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bond requirements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exchange facilitator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[license bond]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surety bond]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jwsuretybonds.com/blog/?p=674</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
			
				
			
		
Califonia&#8217;s SB 1007 law originally did not have any relation to fidelity bonds. When the law was amended and became effective on January 1, 2009, it required exchange facilitators to be licensed and obtain either a minimum $1 million bond or fidelity bond, securities, post cash, or an irrevocable letter of credit in the same [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jwsuretybonds.com%2Fblog%2Fcalifornia-exchange-facilitators-bond"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jwsuretybonds.com%2Fblog%2Fcalifornia-exchange-facilitators-bond&amp;style=normal" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p><img style="float: right" src="http://www.jwsuretybonds.com/images/bond-california.jpg" alt="California" />Califonia&#8217;s SB 1007 law originally did not have any relation to fidelity bonds. When the law was amended and became effective on January 1, 2009, it required exchange facilitators to be licensed and obtain either a minimum $1 million bond or fidelity bond, securities, post cash, or an irrevocable letter of credit in the same amount. Financial Institutions and title insurers, underwritten title companies and controlled escrow companies are exempt from the licensing requirement of the bill, but they still need to comply with the bonding and insurance requirements.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jwsuretybonds.com/blog/california-exchange-facilitators-bond/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Texas Mortgage Broker License Bond</title>
		<link>http://www.jwsuretybonds.com/blog/texas-mortgage-broker-license-bond</link>
		<comments>http://www.jwsuretybonds.com/blog/texas-mortgage-broker-license-bond#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 17:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lisa Grimsley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commercial Bonds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgage Broker Bonds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surety News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bond requirements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[license & permit bond]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[license bond]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgage broker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surety bond]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tx]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jwsuretybonds.com/blog/?p=642</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
			
				
			
		
On 06/19/2009, Texas has enacted HB 2774. This eliminates the $25,000 net worth and $50,000 license bond requirement for mortgage brokers. This law requires that the financial requirements for holding a mortgage loan officer or mortgage broker&#8217;s license must be met through participation in the mortgage broker recovery fund; under Texas law in section 156.01 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jwsuretybonds.com%2Fblog%2Ftexas-mortgage-broker-license-bond"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jwsuretybonds.com%2Fblog%2Ftexas-mortgage-broker-license-bond&amp;style=normal" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p><img style="float: right" src="http://www.jwsuretybonds.com/images/bond-texas.jpg" alt="Texas" />On 06/19/2009, Texas has enacted HB 2774. This eliminates the $25,000 net worth and $50,000 license bond requirement for mortgage brokers. This law requires that the financial requirements for holding a mortgage loan officer or mortgage broker&#8217;s license must be met through participation in the mortgage broker recovery fund; under Texas law in section 156.01 of the financial code, this already exists. The new law amends the recovery fund provisions. This change limits payments out of the fund to 25,000 aggregate for all claims arising from the same transaction, and to $50,000 as to all claims against a licensee. From now on this will not allow recovery of attorneys&#8217; fees and court costs. Also, payments from the recovery fund will be reduced by any recovery from the surety or insurer. The banking regulators can use these funds to cover any costs of safely managing old mortgage loan documents and any financial responsibilities of administering the fund.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jwsuretybonds.com/blog/texas-mortgage-broker-license-bond/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
