<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Surety Bond Blog &#187; Auto Dealer Bonds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jwsuretybonds.com/blog/tag/auto-dealer-bonds/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jwsuretybonds.com/blog</link>
	<description>General to specific surety bond information, as well as current events within the industry.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 18:39:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Close Call For California Motor Vehicle Dealers</title>
		<link>http://www.jwsuretybonds.com/blog/close-call-for-california-motor-vehicle-dealers</link>
		<comments>http://www.jwsuretybonds.com/blog/close-call-for-california-motor-vehicle-dealers#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 15:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michele Haddon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Auto Dealer Bonds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commercial Bonds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surety News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auto dealer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dealer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[motorcycle dealer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surety bond]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jwsuretybonds.com/blog/?p=263</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A bill opposed by surety associations that would make it near impossible for many auto dealers to get bonded is nearly passed in California.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jwsuretybonds.com%2Fblog%2Fclose-call-for-california-motor-vehicle-dealers"><img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jwsuretybonds.com%2Fblog%2Fclose-call-for-california-motor-vehicle-dealers" height="61" width="51" /></a></div><p>A bill was introduced earlier this year in February that, had it passed, would have made it more difficult for California auto dealers to <a href="http://www.jwsuretybonds.com/blog/how-to-get-licensed-bonded">get bonded</a> or remain bonded.</p>
<p>Assembly Bill 1939 was originally written to increase the cap on the document processing charge for leased vehicles by $20 to $65 and for purchased vehicles by $10 to $65.  Opponents to this bill expressed concerns on behalf of the consumers, who have faced many rising costs lately in other areas, and that this increase would be unjustified.  Opponents also expressed that an increase in fees, if necessary, should be in some way linked to furthering consumer protection.<br />
<img src="http://www.jwsuretybonds.com/images/dealership.jpg"/><br />
In response to opposition, the author of AB 1939 amended the bill in June.  First changing the increase for the document processing charge for leased vehicles by $10 to $55 and dropping the increase for purchased vehicles.  </p>
<p>The amendment also included a change in the <a href="http://www.jwsuretybonds.com">surety bond</a> requirement for dealers and remanufacturers.  Currently, dealers and remanufacturers must file a $50,000 bond with their license.  If the bill were to pass, the surety bond requirement would be increased to $100,000.  The <a href="http://www.jwsuretybonds.com/surety-bonds/commercial-bonds/auto_dealer_bond.htm">Surety Bond of Motorcycle Dealer, Motorcycle Lessor-Retailer, All-Terrain Vehicle Dealer, or Wholesale-Only Dealer</a> (Less than 25 Vehicles per Year) would remain at $10,000.</p>
<p>These amendments failed to appease the original opponents of the bill and brought on additional opponents because of the increase in the surety bond requirement.  Among these opponents, The Surety &#038; Fidelity Association of America (SFAA) raised concerns that the increased bond amount would make it even more difficult for dealers to obtain or maintain their bonding requirements.  Others expressed concerns that the increased bond amount would serve as another barrier to dealers just getting started, especially used car dealers.  </p>
<p>Fortunately, thanks to the efforts of the SFAA, AIA, and other local surety associations, the bill died in Senate after the hearing was cancelled by the author of the bill.  </p>
<p>This topic reinforces the importance of keeping yourself informed of the latest activities of your state legislation.  There may be other bills introduced in the future that could be unfavorable to your industry.  It is essential that they hear your opinions, so that decisions can be made in the best interests of everyone involved.</p>
<p><strong>Helpful Links</strong></p>
<p>Here you search for information about a bill using keywords or the bill number at:<br />
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/bilinfo.html</p>
<p>Submit comments to the <a href="http://www.assembly.ca.gov/acs/acsframeset2text.htm">Assembly on pending legislation</a></p>
<p>They also offer an index that list bills introduced in both the Assembly and the Senate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jwsuretybonds.com/blog/close-call-for-california-motor-vehicle-dealers/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
